Link to us : http://snipr.com/uusxu
The poll question for week 7 was " If technology cannot be made accessible, does the policy prohibit its use? Most of the readers disagreed on the statement which consists of 66.7% and 33.3% of the readers agreed on the statement.
Why most of the readers disagreed on the statement given? It is because the policy is not intended to prohibit the use of a technology, tool, resource or technique that would contribute to the quality of an activity.
If a technology, tool, resource or technique that cannot be made accessible is adopted for use, the adopter should remember that an equally effective accommodation must be provided to any person involved in the activity who needs an accessibility accommodation.
Choosing to use a technology, tool, resource or technique that cannot be made accessible must be defensible as a true contributor to quality, and not done in order to avoid the need to comply with the accessibility policy.
The remaining 33.3% readers agreed on the statement because they did not know how serious it is when technology is not accessible, policy does not prohibit its use because its must be defensible as a true contributor to quality.